What Kejriwal should learn from Chanakya

There was a Telugu movie some time back titled Leader. It features the now-hunk and he-of-the-single-expression Rana Daggubati. It was about the son of an assassinated Chief Minister who becomes the CM in line with his dying father's wishes and sets about cleaning up the state's corruption-ridden politics. I don't see this movie actually happening in the real world but it is a good watch.

In the movie the protagonist moots in the state legislature a proposal to set up an anti-corruption body which will have the power to prosecute everyone. There is vigorous opposition from politicians cutting across political lines (sounds familiar?). He is advised by an elderly politician to remove politicians from the list of people the body can investigate and this immediately finds favour. The logic was that the people in the upper echelons depend on bribes from the lower echelons. If the lower echelons were trapped automatically the bribes for the top will stop. So he was employing one class against the other.

Now coming to today's India Kejriwal and team seem to be after all politicians in India. He must remember a few things. The memory of people is short-lived. Indira Gandhi was voted out of power in 1977 post the emergency. However she came back to power soon. This was at least in some measure due to the incompetence of the Janata government. However people were willing to forgive her. Salman Khan has been accused in hit-and-run and animal hunting cases. In the recent past he is probably the cinema actor whose films have grossed the most at the box office. Kejriwal has decided to take on the entire political establishment. This is foolish, to say the least. For one, in my opinion people of our country don't care enough. Even if they do they care for a very brief time. Look at the fate of Anna Hazare's movement. Hence Kejriwal needs to take a leaf out of Chanakya's book.

What Chanakya had done was probably not ethical but was steeped in realpolitik. He first took the help of some rulers like Malayaketu to remove the Nanda dynasty. Later he removed Malayaketu as he was a threat to Chandragupta. I request correction if I get my facts wrong. Kejriwal should understand and apply the concept of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". If he is correct he should use the current opposition parties to rid the ruling coalition of unwanted elements. Later on he should focus on the current opposition. I remember a discussion on NDTV where there was an NCP representative, Prakash Javadekar from the BJP (I seriously think he should be replaced) and Ms Damania among others. The discussion, or should I say arguments started with Ajit Pawar. The NCP rep who is also the head of one of Air India's pilots' union was brazen in his arguments which was quite irritating. He was being cornered when Damania raised the issue of Gadkari and she and Javadekar started fighting much to the relief of the NCP rep. In this din the whole issue gets forgotten.

So my dear Kejriwalji, please get your focus right. Apparently comedy is all about timing. Let us ensure that the current anti-corruption movement does not end up as a sad joke.

First they ignore you...

How can I be the only one not to comment on the ongoing Lokpal agitation? :) So here's my two cents' worth.

There has been some discussion on the crowds that have been gathering at Ramlila Maidan (RM) with P K Bansal and Ashwani Kumar from the Congress commenting that anybody can draw large crowds. This has obviously led to some strong responses too. Now let us pause here for a moment. 

When I saw a movie called Tagore in Telugu, starring Chiranjeevi, I was taken aback at the crowds that gathered towards the climax of the movie. Probably it was crowds like these that encouraged Chiranjeevi to set up his party and contest elections. But he ended up losing from one of the two constituencies he had stood for election from. So the crowds do not seem to have necessarily translated into votes. 

So I think we can safely assume that the crowds that gather to see a filmstar politician are there more to see the filmstar than anything else. The non-beneficial crowd is especially true in political settings where people can be paid to attend. Another incident is the support that Jagan is garnering in Andhra Pradesh. This is somewhat surprising. Whether or not people believe he is corrupt I am sure many people would agree there is more than what meets the eye as far as Jagan's wealth is concerned. He has of late taken to sending bulk messages to Church Fathers asking them to pray on their behalf, pandering to the Christian community too. So is Jagan right as he draws such huge crowds (not to mention the margin by which he and his mother won their elections)?

Where the Jan Lokpal campaign is different, I would argue is with respect to the increasing and (inter)national participation it is drawing. Crowds for 1-2 days may have been dismissed. However the crowds are only increasing day-by-day. Further, people cutting across states (though I think the response has been quite muted in the south) and even continents are supporting the agitation. The response of the powers-that-be in a way betrays their panic at the response the movement has gathered. It is simply arrogant to dismiss the crowds that have gathered.

However the establishment is right to an extent in asking Anna's team to follow established democratic procedures. I say to an extent. This legislation has been pending for a very long time, further as everyone is aware new cases keep tumbling out on a regular basis today. So the citizens of the country cannot be blamed for a trust deficit. Anna's team has shown some flexibility during negotiations for the duration and venue of the present fast. If the same can be shown and if the government lets go of its arrogance we can hope for a better India. 

To end, I quote a line attributed to Anna's idol - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Should the government note the pattern? Jai Hind!